Nvidia 1660 Vs 1050 Ti

• CPU
• GPU
• SSD
• HDD
• RAM
• USB

Existent World Speed

Performance contour from 1,186,690 user samples

Effective 3D Speed Constructive 3D Gaming GPU Speed		68.5 %	Hugely faster constructive speed. +122%		thirty.9 %

Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)		91.four fps	Hugely better lighting effects. +142%		37.7 fps
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)		92.3 fps	Hugely better reflection handling. +121%		41.7 fps
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)		65.seven fps	Much faster multi rendering. +75%		37.6 fps
Gravity Avg. NBody particle organization (Galaxy)		79.4 fps	Hugely faster NBody adding. +103%		39.2 fps

Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)		98 fps	Hugely better peak lighting effects. +122%		44.ane fps
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)		125 fps	Hugely better acme reflection handling. +158%		48.5 fps
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere)		69.four fps	Much faster peak multi rendering. +79%		38.8 fps
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy)		83.2 fps	Hugely faster peak NBody calculation. +93%		43.ii fps

Market Share

Based on 53,566,601 GPUs tested.

Market Share Market place Share (trailing 30 days)		0.76 %			2.2 %	Hugely higher market share. +189%
Value Value For Money		70.six %	Much improve value. +50%		47.2 %
User Rating UBM User Rating		77 %			79 %	+3%
Cost Price (score)		$230			$155	Much cheaper. +33%

Historic period Newest		39 Months	Much more than recent. +43%		68 Months
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)		85.9 fps	Hugely better peak texture detail. +106%		41.7 fps
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)		75.ane fps	Hugely faster acme complex splatting. +159%		29 fps
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)		76.8 fps	Hugely better texture detail. +102%		38.1 fps
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)		69.7 fps	Hugely faster complex splatting. +162%		26.6 fps

Advertizement

NVIDIA'southward GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month'due south release of the GTX 1660 Ti. Equally the proper name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled dorsum version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs'southward new TU116 Turing based die, accept 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver viii Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, simply with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is too about twenty% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a like real world constructive speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all cost tiers can only be skillful for competition and consumers.^{[ Mar 'nineteen GPUPro]}

More than DETAILS

The GTX 1050 Ti 4GB is Nvidia'due south latest Pascal based GPU. The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) constitute on the 3GB GTX 1060. Comparison userbenchmarks for the 1050 Ti and 3GB 1060 shows that the 1050 Ti is falling a little short of our expectations only we merely have one criterion for the 1050 Ti so the average score volition probably improve equally we get together more samples. The list price for the 1050 Ti is $139 which is between AMDs $185 RX 470 and $100 RX 460. Comparison performance between the RX 470 vs GTX 1050 Ti and RX 460 vs GTX 1050 Ti shows that the 1050 Ti sits roughly in the eye for both cost and performance.^{[ Oct 'sixteen GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

• Gigabyte B450M DS3H (three,345)
• Cyberpowerpc C SERIES (2,389)
• Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (2,311)
• MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (two,016)
• Asus Prime number B450M-A (i,842)
• Asus PRIME A320M-1000 (1,459)
• Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS Elite (1,430)

• Asus PRIME A320M-K (4,476)
• Gigabyte B450M DS3H (three,374)
• Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (two,482)
• Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (2,279)
• bin bin (ii,149)
• MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (two,112)
• Dell OptiPlex 7010 (one,839)

Advertizement

Grouping Examination Results

• All-time user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
• Best value for money - Value for money is based on real earth performance.
• Fastest existent earth speed - Real World Speed measures operation for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Demote your build) Size upwards your PC in less than a infinitesimal.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark volition exam your PC and compare the results to other users with the aforementioned components. You lot can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the all-time upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the calendar month

How it works

• - Download and run UserBenchMark.
• - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
• - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
• - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
• - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
• - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
• - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
• - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
• - Meet speed exam results from other users.
• - Compare your components to the electric current market leaders.
• - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
• - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Often Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Source: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1660-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1050-Ti/4038vs3649

Share this post